Overkill: On only a 100% recount of VVPATs

Context:

Despite the introduction of the Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) alongside Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and the provision for counting VVPAT tallies from random polling booths, critics continue to raise concerns about the use of EVMs in Indian elections. The Supreme Court of India has listed petitions related to demands for a 100% recount of all VVPATs.

Transparency Enhancement with Machine Audit Trail:

• Proposal: Some suggest maintaining a machine audit trail of all executed commands beyond just recording votes, allowing for an audit to rule out malicious code and enhance transparency.
• System Upgrade: Implementing such a measure could make the electoral system more robust and address concerns about potential tampering with EVMs.
• Need for Audit: Critics argue that a comprehensive audit is necessary to ensure the integrity of the electoral process and instill confidence in the voting system.

Addressing Potential Vulnerabilities Introduced by VVPATs:

• Concerns Raised: The use of VVPATs has introduced potential vulnerabilities that were not present with standalone EVMs, leading to calls for reworking safeguards to ensure security.
• Safeguard Enhancement: By strengthening technical and administrative safeguards, VVPAT-combined systems can be made as secure and foolproof as standalone EVMs.
• Balancing Security and Transparency: Efforts should focus on finding a balance between ensuring the security of the electoral process and maintaining transparency in voting procedures.

Evidence of EVM Reliability and Minimal Discrepancies:

• Lack of Proof for Tampering: Despite concerns, there has been no concrete evidence of tampering with EVMs, and instances of malpractices remain unsubstantiated.
• Minimal Discrepancies: Sample counting of VVPATs in elections has revealed minuscule discrepancies between VVPAT recounts and EVM counts, primarily due to minor errors.
• Solutions for Confidence Building: Enhancing recount samples and implementing targeted recounts in close-margin seats can address concerns and build trust in the electoral process without necessitating a full recount.