2G Spectrum Case

More than 12 years after it was delivered, the Centre moved the Supreme Court seeking modification of its verdict in the 2G spectrum case as the Centre wanted to grant 2G spectrum licences in some cases.

The settled Judgement of Supreme Court in 2G Spectrum case

• The only mode: Auction is the only mode for granting licences for natural resources like spectrum, the radio frequencies allocated to the mobile phone industry for communication over the airwaves.
• Duty bound: When it comes to alienation of scarce natural resources like spectrum etc, it is the burden of the State to ensure that a non-discriminatory method is adopted for distribution and alienation, which would necessarily result in protection of national/public interest.

1: Dimension- Significance of 2G spectrum case

• The allocation of natural resources, such as spectrum, is a critical issue that affects the functioning of various industries, particularly the telecommunications sector. The 2G spectrum case in India serves as a significant landmark in highlighting the importance of fair and transparent resource allocation methods.
• Auctions ensure transparency, fairness, and maximum revenue generation for the government, thereby safeguarding public interest.

2: Dimension- Lessons Learned

• Transparency and Accountability: The 2G spectrum case emphasizes the need for transparent and accountable mechanisms in allocating natural resources. Auctions serve as a robust method to achieve these objectives, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and in the best interest of the public.
• Preventing Corruption and Favoritism: By mandating auctions as the sole mode of allocation, the Supreme Court's verdict aimed to curb corruption and favoritism in resource allocation processes. Auctions minimize the potential for undue influence and ensure equal opportunities for all stakeholders.

The 2G spectrum case serves as a reminder of the critical importance of fair and transparent allocation of natural resources. By emphasizing the role of auctions and the state's duty to protect public interest, the judgment sets a precedent for ensuring integrity and accountability in resource allocation processes.