What's New :
CSE QUALIFIER 2026: Complete Prelims & Mains Readiness through Daily Tests & Mentorship
23rd August 2025 (14 Topics)

Nicobar Project and Tribal Rights

Context:

The Nicobarese Tribal Council has alleged that the Andaman & Nicobar Islands administration falsely certified settlement of Forest Rights Act (FRA) claims to grant forest clearances for the ?72,000-crore Great Nicobar Island Project.

Great Nicobar Island Project

  • Proposed mega infrastructure project includes a transshipment port, international airport, power plant, and township.
  • Requires diversion of 13,075 hectares of forest land, impacting ecologically sensitive and tribal areas.
  • Located in Great Nicobar Island, which is strategically significant due to proximity to Malacca Strait.

Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006 vs PAT, 1956

  • FRA, 2006: Recognises forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes’ rights; diversion of forest land requires Gram Sabha consent after rights settlement.
  • Protection of Aboriginal Tribes Regulation, 1956 (PAT56): Provides administrator wide authority to restrict land transfer and protect indigenous tribes in A&N Islands.
  • Controversy: Administration claims FRA not applicable since PAT56 already protects forests, but FRA has stronger provisions of consent and rights settlement.

Concerns of the Nicobarese Council

  • Alleged false certification declaring FRA rights settled, though the process had not even been initiated.
  • Gram Sabha consent claimed by administration is disputed, as local Nicobarese were reportedly not part of the meeting.
  • Raises critical issues of tribal consent, environmental clearance, and constitutional protection for vulnerable communities (Articles 244, 338A, and Fifth & Sixth Schedule provisions relevant for tribal areas).

Verifying, please be patient.

Enquire Now