Context
Recently, a five-member Constitution bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, unanimously upheld the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, noting that Article 370 was a temporary provision and that the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir had no internal sovereignty.
About
What was all Article 370 about?
Why there was a need for such an Action?
Arguments and Questionnaire around Abrogation of Article 370:
About the Recent Verdict:
Arguments/Answersgiven for ‘Abrogation of Article 370’:
Arguments in favour of Article 370:
It's important to recognize that opinions within Jammu and Kashmir are diverse, and there is no single, unified solution for the issue in the region. The region has a long history of complex geopolitical and socio-cultural dynamics, contributing to a multiplicity of viewpoints.
Verifying, please be patient.