What's New :
GS Mains PYQ Advance, Click Here
20th September 2025 (16 Topics)

Supreme Court on Student Mental Health

Context:

The Supreme Court in SukdebSaha vs State of Andhra Pradesh (July 2025) recognized mental health as part of the right to life under Article 21.

Constitutional and Legal Significance

  • Mental health recognized as integral to Article 21 (Right to Life).
  • Builds upon Mental Healthcare Act 2017, elevating the statutory right to fundamental constitutional right.
  • Establishes Saha Guidelines: mandatory mental health support in schools, colleges, hostels, coaching institutes; district-level monitoring committees; enforceable until Parliament enacts a full code.

Socio-Criminological Dimensions

  • Highlights structural victimisation: systemic neglect by educational institutions and state contributes to student vulnerability.
  • Connects to structural violence theory (Johan Galtung): indirect societal harm through denial of basic needs (mental well-being) is blameworthy.
  • Shifts perspective: student suicides are public injustice, not only individual tragedy.

Policy and Implementation Challenges

  • Judicial recognition alone insufficient; effectiveness depends on institutional compliance, resource allocation, and personnel training.
  • Emphasizes the need for proactive measures: counselling, preventive mechanisms, and restorative interventions.

Verifying, please be patient.

Enquire Now