What's New :
Target PT - Prelims Classes 2025. Visit Here
26th December 2024 (13 Topics)

Australia’s Proposed Law on Social Media Age Restrictions

Context

Australia’s Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill, 2024, seeks to address concerns surrounding the online safety of minors by setting the minimum age for creating social media accounts at 16 years. The legislation amends existing laws, including the Age Discrimination Act, 2024, to facilitate its implementation. Once passed, it will mark a significant step in regulating social media use by minors, aligning with global discussions on online safety.

Key Features of the Proposed Law

  • Applicability: The law targets Age-Restricted Social Media Platforms (ARSMPs), which facilitate online interaction and content sharing among users. Platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, and others are likely to be included under its purview.
    • The Minister of Communication retains the discretion to exempt specific platforms from the definition of ARSMPs.
  • Compliance Obligations: Platforms must take reasonable steps to ensure individuals under 16 years do not create accounts. Failure to comply may attract civil penalties of up to USD 49.5 million.
    • Guidelines for compliance will be developed by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, ensuring clarity on what constitutes “reasonable steps.”
  • Timeline and Implementation: The law’s enforcement is set to begin no earlier than 12 months after approval, allowing time for stakeholder consultations and age-verification trials.
    • Platforms will be required to implement age-verification mechanisms for all account holders, ensuring adherence to the minimum age requirement.
  • Data Privacy and Security: Platforms must destroy personal data collected during age verification after its intended use, with penalties under the Privacy Act, 1988 for misuse or unauthorized disclosure.
    • Privacy obligations aim to mitigate risks associated with sensitive data collection and its potential misuse.

Underlying Concerns and Criticism

  • Challenges of Implementation: The lack of a universally accepted age-verification technology has been highlighted as a hurdle, with Australia’s Age Verification Roadmap acknowledging the evolving nature of this field.
  • Privacy Risks: Critics have raised concerns about the extent and type of data required for age verification, noting potential trade-offs between ensuring safety and protecting user privacy.
  • Effectiveness of the Ban: Research underscores the dual nature of social media—while it can offer connectivity and support, it also exposes minors to risks like bullying, self-harm, and disordered eating.
    • Academics and stakeholders argue that blanket bans may oversimplify complex issues, advocating for nuanced solutions that balance risks and benefits.
  • Criticisms from Political Groups: Critics have described the legislation as “rushed” and questioned its alignment with existing evidence, calling for a more measured approach.
  • Age limits for social media aren’t the most effective way to protect teens from its potential harms. Young people have shown remarkable prowess for finding workarounds — even those under the age of 13 whom most platforms already prohibit. Using social media is not inherently beneficial or harmful to teens, but strict age limits ignore individual differences in adolescents’ maturity levels.
    • In other words, turning 16 doesn’t instantly make you more competent at navigating the digital world than a mature 14-year-old.

Pros

Cons

  • Protects Mental Health: Helps shield children from anxiety, depression, and negative effects of unrealistic social comparisons.
  • Limits Exposure to Harmful Content: Reduces the risk of cyberbullying, exposure to explicit content, and predatory behavior.
  • Encourages Age-Appropriate Interactions: Keeps younger users away from content and interactions not suitable for their age.
  • Promotes Responsible Use: Encourages platforms to adopt stricter guidelines and develop safer environments for younger users.
  • Supports Parental Control Efforts: Aligns with parental intentions to shield children from negative online experiences.
  • Reduces Risk of Addiction: May help mitigate excessive screen time and overuse among younger users.
  • Privacy Concerns: Age-verification methods (e.g., ID verification, credit card use) can raise significant privacy issues.
  • False Sense of Security: Banning may lead parents to believe their children are safe, while children may still bypass restrictions.
  • Push to Unregulated Spaces: Banned users might migrate to unregulated platforms, increasing risks of harmful exposure.
  • Denies Positive Benefits: Prevents children from accessing social media’s educational, social, and creative opportunities.
  • Technological Limitations: Existing age-verification systems are not foolproof and often easy for tech-savvy children to bypass.
  • Enforcement Challenges: Difficult to reliably verify users' ages due to loopholes like false birth dates and VPN use.

Global Comparisons

  • United States: Previous efforts to impose age restrictions through laws like the Communication Decency Act, 1996, and the Children’s Online Protection Act, 1998, were struck down due to constitutional challenges related to free speech.
    • Current U.S. laws, such as the Children’s Internet Protection Act, 2000, focus on ensuring online safety in schools and libraries through filtering technology.
  • India: While Indian laws address online child pornography and require platforms to exercise due diligence, there are no restrictions on minors creating accounts on social media platforms.
X

Verifying, please be patient.

Enquire Now