What's New :
Gist of India Year Book (IYB) 2024. Download Here...
Thematic Current Affairs Compilation. Download here...

Law Optional (Separation of powers and constitutional governance) by Rajnish Jindal

  • Category
    Optional
  • Test Date
    28-06-2023 07:00 AM
  • Evaluated
    Yes

Instruction:

  • There will be 2 questions carrying 10 marks each. Write your answers in 150 words
  • Any page left blank in the answer-book must be crossed out clearly.
  • Evaluated Copy will be re-uploaded on the same thread after 2 days of uploading the copy.
  • Discussion of the question and one to one answer improvement session of evaluated copies will be conducted through Google Meet with concerned faculty. You will be informed via mail or SMS for the discussion.

Question #1. Resorting to ordinances has always raised concern on violation of the spirit of separation of powers doctrine. While noting the rationales justifying the power to promulgate ordinances, analyze whether the decisions of the Supreme Court on the issue have further facilitated resorting to this power. Should the power to promulgate ordinances be repealed?

Question #2. In Indian Constitutional system, the doctrine of separation of powers is envisaged. However, Judicial Legislation has become antithetical to this in the recent past. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.

(Examiner will pay special attention to the candidate's grasp of his/her material, its relevance to the subject chosen, and to his/ her ability to think constructively and to present his/her ideas concisely, logically and effectively).

Model Answer

Question #1. Resorting to ordinances has always raised concern on violation of the spirit of separation of powers doctrine. While noting the rationales justifying the power to promulgate ordinances, analyze whether the decisions of the Supreme Court on the issue have further facilitated resorting to this power. Should the power to promulgate ordinances be repealed?

Ans.

The ordinance power (Article 123) was originally conceived as an emergency provision. However, in the frequent use of ordinance power has led to the undermining the role of the legislature by executive and the doctrine of Separation of powers. The Constituent Assembly debates leave no manner of doubt that the said power ought not to be exercised merely to circumvent a failure to muster support in the legislature. The satisfaction of the president at the time of the promulgation of an ordinance is within the purview of judicial review. The government will have to satisfy the Court about whether the satisfaction for re-promulgation was based on some relevant material. Historically, in the 1950s, central ordinances were issued at an average of 7.1 per year. 

In RC Cooper Case 1970, Supreme Court held that the President’s decision to promulgate ordinance could be challenged on the grounds that ‘immediate action’ was not required, and the ordinance had been issued primarily to bypass debate and discussion in the legislature. In DC Wadhwa Case 1987, Supreme court held that the legislative power of the executive to promulgate ordinances is to be used in exceptional circumstances and not as a substitute for the law-making power of the legislature. In Krishna Kumar Singh Case 2017, Supreme Court held that the authority to issue ordinances is not an absolute entrustment, but is “conditional upon satisfaction that circumstances exist rendering it necessary to take immediate action”. It further stated that the re-promulgation of ordinances is a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of democratic legislative processes. An ordinance “ceases to operate” six weeks after the two Houses reassemble, except if it is converted into an Act by then. Re-promulgation sidesteps this limitation.

This practice becomes unacceptable when it degenerates into an “ordinance raj”, where ordinances are seldom brought before the legislature but are re-issued again and again, violating the spirit of the Constitution. Ordinance is an undemocratic route to law-making, which is the job of the legislature. Therefore, any executive attempt at law-making is not good for any democracy. Re-promulgation of ordinances is a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of the democratic legislative processes. The raison d’être for this dictum is that re-promulgation represents an effort to overreach the legislative process which is the primary source of law-making in a parliamentary democracy.




Question #2. In Indian Constitutional system, the doctrine of separation of powers is envisaged. However, Judicial Legislation has become antithetical to this in the recent past. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.

Ans.

The concept of separation of powers is the rudimentary element for the governance of a  democratic country. This principle corroborates fairness, impartiality and uprightness in the workings of a government. Although it is not followed in its strict sense yet, most of the democratic countries have adopted its diluted version under their respective constitutions.

However, in the recent times, Judicial legislation has come under scrutiny as it is seen as an encroachment on power of legislature and executive by judiciary, therefore disturbing the delicate balance between three organs of government in ways such as:

  • Directive by Supreme Court to play National Anthem in cinema halls.
  • MC Mehta case – Ban on BS 4 vehicles.
  • Ban on alcohol on roads by Supreme Court.
  • Arun Gopal case – Fixed timings for fireworks on Diwali.

But on the other side, PIL as an instrument of judicial activism on the other hand has also led to a delivering of the several important judgements such as –

  • Assuring social justice – The vulnerable groups like workers, prisoners, elders etc. get justice through PIL. Example in Hussinara Khatoon Case 40,000 undertrials were released from jail.
  • Enforcing rights of the weaker sections, thus making the justice more inclusive. Example in Asiad workers case, Supreme Court ruled that workers not getting minimum wage can approach Supreme Court directly.
  • Putting legislative and executive bodies into action – Example Vishakha guidelines provided the framework for Sexual Harassment Prevention and Prohibition Act of 2013.
  • Environmental protection – Supreme Court directed the central government to form an EPCA for Delhi environment betterment, directions regarding smog towers etc.
  • Election Reforms – Supreme Court has spearheaded the process of electoral reforms through various judgements. Example the PIL filed by Lily Thomas and Lok Prahar resulted into disqualification of convicted MP’s.
  • Filling the vacuum created by inaction of legislature and executive, PIL acts as a route through which people seek redressal for inaction.

Thus, PIL is an effective powerful instrument of legislation when used judiciously and in order to check the misuse of PIL, Supreme Court has given guidelines in State of Uttaranchal versus Balwant Singh case. These guidelines must be followed by all court so that judicial activism does not turn into judicial adventurism.

Procedure of Answer Writing:

To participate in the answer writing program, Register yourself for the test. Copies will be evaluated only for the registered students. Registration will be closed after the scheduled date.

Answer Writing, Copy Evaluation, and Marks Improvement Cycle:

Step 1 (Theme, Details & Its Topics):

  1. Every round of Answer writing initiative will be around a theme related to the Subject/Topic.
  2. Please read the theme and its description, and try to cover the topics given within the theme before writing the answer along with the sources.

Step 2 (Answer Writing):

  1. Questions will be uploaded on the portal on the scheduled date at 7:00 AM.
  2. You have to write your answers on an A4 size sheet leaving margins on both sides based on the UPSC pattern.
  3. Mention your name, email id, location, and phone number on the 1st page in the top right corner and the page number on each page.
  4. After writing the answers, Click pictures of each page of your answer sheet, merge them all in a single PDF and upload them in the upload section of the same question.
  5. Kindly submit your written answers before 7:00 PM. Only the first 100 copies will be considered for evaluation. No request for late submission or evaluation will be entertained once the 100 mark is reached.

Note: Answer sheets without the proper guidelines given above will not be accepted for evaluation.

Step 3 (Copy Evaluation): Copies will be evaluated in the next 72 hours of the test date. After evaluation, copies will be uploaded into your account. During the copy evaluation period, doubt clearing and discussion about the theme or topic of the test with respective mentors of the test will be done in the telegram group

Step 4 (Mentorship): Evaluated copies will be sent to you via mail and also uploaded into your account on the website. After that a mentorship session for the marks improvement with respective faculty will be conducted on the Google Meet, so that students can get a wider perspective of the topics. Here you can discuss your evaluated copies also with the faculty. Top 5 copies of every test will be shared in the telegram group for reference.

Note: Aspirants who have not written the test can also participate in the mentorship session.

For Updates and Mentorship of the session, you will be notified through SMS or Telegram Group.

For Notification And Update About the Program Join Telegram Group at: https://t.me/gsscoreopendailyanswerwriting

Note: You have to write your answers on an A4 size sheet leaving margins on both sides based on UPSC pattern. Mention Your Name on 1st page and Page Number on each page. After writing the answer, Click pictures of each page of your answer sheet, merge them all in a single PDF and upload in the Your Answer Copy section of the same question.

Copy submission is closed now for this test.

GS Mains Classes GS Classes 2024 GS Classes 2024 UPSC Study Material

Verifying, please be patient.

Our Centers

DELHI (Karol Bagh)

GS SCORE, 1B, Second Floor, Pusa Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005 (Beside Karol Bagh Metro Station Gate No. 8)

Get directions on Google Maps

BHUBANESWAR (Jaydev Vihar)

GS SCORE, Plot No.2298, Jaydev Vihar Square, Near HCG Day Care, BBSR - 751013

Get directions on Google Maps

LUCKNOW (Aliganj)

GS SCORE, 2nd Floor, B-33, Sangam Chauraha, Sector H, Aliganj, Lucknow, UP - 226024

Get directions on Google Maps

Enquire Now