What's New :

Public Administration Optional (Comparative Public Administration (Paper-1)) by Abhishiekh Saxena

Instruction:

  • There will be 2 questions carrying the First Question is-10 marks Write your answers in 150 words and the Second Question is-15 marks Write your answers in 250 words.
  • Any page left blank in the answer-book must be crossed out clearly.
  • Evaluated Copy will be re-uploaded on the same thread after 2 days of uploading the copy.
  • Discussion of the question and one to one answer improvement session of evaluated copies will be conducted through Google Meet with concerned faculty. You will be informed via mail or SMS for the discussion.

Question #1. CPA’s behavioural orientation made it inexact and problematic. Comment. 10 marks (150 words)

Question #2. “CPA shares with modern organization theory a concern for methodological problems....” Waldo. Analyse. 15 marks (250 words)

 

(Examiner will pay special attention to the candidate's grasp of his/her material, its relevance to the subject chosen, and to his/ her ability to think constructively and to present his/her ideas concisely, logically and effectively).

Model Answer

Question #1. CPA’s behavioural orientation made it inexact and problematic. Comment. 10 marks (150 words)

Approach:

  • Basics of orientation of CPA,
  • Flaws associated with it.

Comparative Administration attempts to compare the administrative functioning in different countries with diverse cultural, social, economic and political setup. Main objective of CPA was to build a theory of Public Administration which would be empirical, systemic and ecological. CPA attempts to build a knowledge of facts and data which could help to generalise administration at a global level at the same time accounting for the uniqueness of it due different ecological factors.

CPA got a major boost from the Ford Foundation in early 1960’s to research in comparative studies of administration. However it also led to an inherent bias towards the administration of the developed countries. There was a tendency to view the administration of developed countries as more advanced as compared to the one existing in developing countries. The criticism of CPA was that it ignored and treated the pre-beauracratic social norms of control and community functioning in developing countries as irrational and backward. They failed to appreciate the functioning of administrative system of developing nations and the stability and effectiveness they had provided even in such diverse cultural and heterogeneous society.

This behavioral tendency of biases in CPA stems from the fact that most of the scholars of CPA were from developed countries of USA and Europe. They tried to ignore the irrationality and deficiency of administration prevalent in developed countries and over-exposed the pre-bureaucratic setup of developing countries.

The major problems:

  1. It compared weberian structure in emerging nations, herby it had no structural paradigm of its own.eg Lapalambora in Russia, ferrel heady in egpyt and Riggs in india and phillipines.
  2. It focussed on behavioural traits of these nations.Eg, F.W.Riggs prismatic sala model had transition societies as the basis .He gave various behavioural traits of these socities such as hetrogeniety,formalism and overlapping as the traits .They emphasised on behavioural traits and ignored the structural features of these socities.
  3. The norms ,polity and interest groups of the society were defined on the behaviour of these societies such as polynormatism, unbalanced polity and clects .

Though CPA started with comparing administration practices around the world but it largely centered around the behavioural trends of the society. It had placed ecology as an significant aspect of the administration and it observed how the ecology changed people behaviour.

Thus though CPA widen the horizon of Public Administration by initiating the comparitive studies and building up knowledge base of administration prevalent in different cultural setting but it couldn’t remain aloof from the North Vs South or all good in Developed and all bad in Developing nations bias.

Question #2. “CPA shares with modern organization theory a concern for methodological problems....” Waldo. Analyse. 15 marks (250 words)

    Approach:

    • Build on the statement by Waldo and share his views on CPA.

    According to Waldo, comparative public administration (CPA) both resembles and differs from modern organisation theory. Waldo wrote: to compare is to examine similarities and differences simultaneously; the effort is bent forward to two main ends:

    (i) to discover, define and differentiate the stuff (politics or administration) to be compared, wherever in the world it may be; and

    (ii) to develop criteria of differentiation that are useful in ordering and analyzing the ‘stuff’ once it has been identified.

    He adds that, CPA shares with modern organization theory a concern for methodological problems; a reliance on models such as the systems framework and structural functionalism; an interdisciplinary orientation a search for universal concepts, formulas, and theories; and an emphasis on empirical description. CPA differs from modern organization theory, however, in its explicit comparative perspective, its focus on cultural diversity, and its fascination with Weberian bureaucracies.

    Though it was at one time widely believed that CPA was the area of greatest promise in contemporary public administration, Waldo feels that promise has yet to be fulfilled. CPA tells us about the relationship between administration and social ends , the critical dependence of civilization on effective governmental administration and the difficulties in transferring the Western model of administration to other cultures. But the basic problem of the CPA movement was the distance between the theoretical models employed and the evidence of field research. And even with its strong theoretical bent, Waldo asserts that the movement failed to produce anything in the way of rigorous theory.

    Procedure of Answer Writing:

    To participate in the answer writing program, Register yourself for the test. Copies will be evaluated only for the registered students. Registration will be closed after the scheduled date.

    Answer Writing, Copy Evaluation, and Marks Improvement Cycle:

    Step 1 (Theme, Details & Its Topics):

    1. Every round of Answer writing initiative will be around a theme related to the Subject/Topic.
    2. Please read the theme and its description, and try to cover the topics given within the theme before writing the answer along with the sources.

    Step 2 (Answer Writing):

    1. Questions will be uploaded on the portal on the scheduled date at 7:00 AM.
    2. You have to write your answers on an A4 size sheet leaving margins on both sides based on the UPSC pattern.
    3. Mention your name, email id, location, and phone number on the 1st page in the top right corner and the page number on each page.
    4. After writing the answers, Click pictures of each page of your answer sheet, merge them all in a single PDF and upload them in the upload section of the same question.
    5. Kindly submit your written answers before 7:00 PM. Only the first 100 copies will be considered for evaluation. No request for late submission or evaluation will be entertained once the 100 mark is reached.

    Note: Answer sheets without the proper guidelines given above will not be accepted for evaluation.

    Step 3 (Copy Evaluation): Copies will be evaluated in the next 72 hours of the test date. After evaluation, copies will be uploaded into your account. During the copy evaluation period, doubt clearing and discussion about the theme or topic of the test with respective mentors of the test will be done in the telegram group

    Step 4 (Mentorship): Evaluated copies will be sent to you via mail and also uploaded into your account on the website. After that a mentorship session for the marks improvement with respective faculty will be conducted on the Google Meet, so that students can get a wider perspective of the topics. Here you can discuss your evaluated copies also with the faculty. Top 5 copies of every test will be shared in the telegram group for reference.

    Note: Aspirants who have not written the test can also participate in the mentorship session.

    For Updates and Mentorship of the session, you will be notified through SMS or Telegram Group.

    For Notification And Update About the Program Join Telegram Group at: https://t.me/gsscoreopendailyanswerwriting

    Note: You have to write your answers on an A4 size sheet leaving margins on both sides based on UPSC pattern. Mention Your Name on 1st page and Page Number on each page. After writing the answer, Click pictures of each page of your answer sheet, merge them all in a single PDF and upload in the Your Answer Copy section of the same question.

    Copy submission is closed now for this test.

    GS Mains Classes GS Classes 2024 GS Classes 2024 UPSC Study Material

    Verifying, please be patient.

    Our Centers

    DELHI (Karol Bagh)

    GS SCORE, 1B, Second Floor, Pusa Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi - 110005 (Beside Karol Bagh Metro Station Gate No. 8)

    Get directions on Google Maps

    BHUBANESWAR (Jaydev Vihar)

    GS SCORE, Plot No.2298, Jaydev Vihar Square, Near HCG Day Care, BBSR - 751013

    Get directions on Google Maps

    LUCKNOW (Aliganj)

    GS SCORE, 2nd Floor, B-33, Sangam Chauraha, Sector H, Aliganj, Lucknow, UP - 226024

    Get directions on Google Maps

    Enquire Now