There is a need to envision better ways for Parliament to write a fiscal responsibility law for lawmakers.
Challenge of Fiscal Responsibility Law
Political Overspending: Ruling parties tend to overspend to secure future electoral victories, leading to fiscal issues down the line.
Deferred Taxation: The practice of excessive spending today ultimately translates into increased taxes for citizens in the future.
Global Models: Countries like Germany and the U.S. implement fiscal mechanisms (e.g., debt brake, debt ceiling) to restrict borrowing and effectively manage debt levels.
Flaws in India's Fiscal Responsibility Law
FRBM Act's Introduction: Instituted in 2003, the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act aimed to rein in excessive deficits.
Amendments Weakening Targets: Frequent legislative changes, facilitated through Finance Acts, erode the original fiscal targets set by the FRBM Act.
Constitutional Barriers: The classification of the Finance Bill as a money bill grants the executive government the authority to modify FRL provisions, circumventing parliamentary scrutiny and debate.
Parliamentary Constraints and Solutions
Anti-Defection Law's Limitations: MPs cannot vote against party wishes. Voting down the Finance Bill, vital for fiscal control, is a nuclear option.
The Flawed Concept of Money Bill: Considered the ultimate escape clause, regardless of fiscal rule's design, hindering fiscal responsibility.
Need for Fiscal Institution Building: Instead of an FRL as Parliamentary law, focus should be on robust fiscal institutions to ensure responsibility.