28th October 2023
Editorials
Context:
World faces crises in Ukraine and West Asia, with intertwined security threats. Global deficits in peace, development, security, governance grow in which collaborative efforts of India and China can contribute.
Historical Vision
- Vision for Global Fairness and Justice: Both China and India, with ancient civilizations, share a vision for global fairness and justice. This aligns with China's vision of a world for the common good and India's motto "VasudhaivaKutumbakam."
- Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence: In the 1950s, they established the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence, shaping international norms. As populous developing nations, they're pivotal in global development.
- A Global Community of Shared Future: President Xi Jinping advocates for a global community of shared future, emphasizing peace, security, development, intercultural learning, and ecological preservation.
Incorporating the Vision
- Inclusion in Global Declarations and Resolutions: The concept of a shared future is integrated into UN resolutions, SCO, and BRICS declarations. It garners support, especially from developing nations.
- Guiding principles: include embracing economic globalization that serves developing countries, rejecting unilateralism, and prioritizing mutual cooperation.
- Embracing Peace for Collective Progress: Peaceful development is crucial; peace is fundamental for progress. Embracing peace, cooperation, and mutual benefit leads to collective advancement.
China's Role in Global Community Building
- Belt and Road Initiative (BRI):These initiatives form a cornerstone in building a global community, offering comprehensive solutions to humanity's pressing issues.
- Collaborative Potential of China and India:By aligning with global development, security, and civilization initiatives, China and India showcase the shared resolve of Global South nations for a prosperous, secure, and harmonious world.
- Promoting Unity:Their combined efforts can pave the way for a future of universal peace, security, and prosperity.
Editorials
Context:
The global, male dominated money-driven, system of institutions of business and society needs an overhaul.
Challenging Male-Centric Economic Perspectives
- Imbalance in Economic Narratives: Notably, Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences heavily skewed towards male recipients, highlighting a gender disparity.
- Claudia Goldin's Nobel Recognition: Claudia Goldin's 2023 Nobel Prize sheds light on the persistent wage gap between men and women in similar roles.
- India's Unique Economic Challenge:India grapples with a changing employment landscape, with a significant youth population facing a shift towards gig economy and short-term contracts.
Need to focus on
- Giving more work opportunities: Emphasizes the need for dignified work opportunities and investing in undervalued care-giving services, crucial for human development.
- Looking for Solutions: Calls for localized, bottom-up solutions tailored to diverse regional contexts, as opposed to top-down, one-size-fits-all policies.
- Women’s freedom with dignity: Advocates for women's freedom to shape family-oriented institutions and empowering local communities in crafting inclusive solutions.
Reimagining Economic Paradigms
- GDP-Centric Approaches: India's ambition for a $10 trillion GDP urges a reevaluation of women's roles, potentially pulling them from informal sectors into industrial establishments.
- Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Imperative: G-20's assessment reveals a concerning lack of progress toward achieving the 17 SDGs, demanding a shift in approach.
- Empowering Women and Local Communities:Urges a paradigm shift towards a more inclusive and sustainable economic model, challenging the dominance of male-driven, competitive paradigms
Editorials
Context:
The significant role played by messaging services like WhatsApp and Signal, as well as video services like YouTube, in mediating the flow of information to users is crucial, but it faces deep fakes challenge.
Proposed Measures
- Central Government’s rules: The central government is considering the implementation of Rule 4(2) from the 2021 Information Technology Intermediary Guidelines. This rule mandates that major social media messaging platforms have the capability to identify the "first originator of the information" on their platform
- Challenges of Deep Fakes: Advanced AI tools can create convincing deep fakes, posing a threat to electoral integrity.
- Encryption vs. Law Enforcement: End-to-end encryption safeguards communication privacy, viewed as a challenge by law enforcement agencies. But implementation details are crucial for effectiveness.
Concerns
- Broad Interpretation of Grounds: Public order restrictions have been applied in diverse contexts, potentially leading to excessive intrusion.
- Undefined "First Originator": Ambiguity surrounds the term "first originator," allowing room for misinterpretation and potential misuse.
- Privacy Compromised for All Users: Traceability relies on maintaining logs of message origins, compromising privacy for all messaging users.
Potential Ramifications
- Legal Challenges to Rule 4(2): Rule 4(2) is currently being contested in courts, with the Tripura High Court recently staying an order.
- Judicial intervention: Courts emphasize the need to establish a threat to public order before invoking the rule, highlighting potential legal hurdles.
- Potential Floodgates of Message Traceability: This could have far-reaching implications for privacy, potentially surpassing the problem it seeks to solve.