What's New :
4th January 2024 (9 Topics)

4th January 2024

QUIZ - 4th January 2024

5 Questions

7 Minutes

Editorials

Context:

Drivers’ strike is a test for severity of hit-and-run clause in new penal code.

Scrutiny of BNS Provision

  • Introduction of Section 106: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) introduces Section 106, treating hit-and-run accidents as an aggravated form of causing death by rashness or negligence.
  • Truck Drivers' Concerns: Section 106 raises concerns among truck drivers, leading to abstention from work.
  • Government's Response: The government assures implementation post-consultation with the All India Motor Transport Congress.

Transporters' Perspective

  • Strike Dynamics: Transporters' strike primarily triggered by drivers' fears of additional criminal liability.
  • Worker-Centric Issue: The issue shifts from concerns of those running transportation businesses to worries of transport workers.
  • Perceived Unjustified Protest: Understanding the strike against the backdrop of road accidents being a major cause of fatalities in India makes it unjustified.

Section 106 Components

  • Replacement of IPC Section 304A: Section 106 to replace IPC Section 304A, addressing death caused by rash and negligent acts with enhanced penalties.
  • Key Components of Section 106: Overview of Section 106, incorporating prison terms, fines, and reduced liability for medical professionals.
  • Hit-and-Run Dynamics: Clause imposes a 10-year imprisonment for failing to report accidents promptly, especially in hit-and-run cases.
You must be logged in to get greater insights.

Editorials

Context:

Raised concerns about the long-term sustainability of India’s debts.      

IMF Concerns on India's Debt Sustainability

  • Debt Sustainability Alarm: IMF raises concerns over India's long-term debt sustainability, projecting it to be 100% of GDP by 2028, emphasizing the need for prudent management.
  • Climate Change and Investments: The report highlights the impact of climate change, urging India to secure concessional financing, enhance private sector investments, and implement carbon pricing for climate resilience.
  • Finance Ministry's Response: The Finance Ministry dismisses IMF projections as a worst-case scenario, asserting it is not inevitable.

Global Debt Conundrum

  • Debt's Development Role: Government borrowings can accelerate development, yet excessive debt can impede growth, hinder access to financing, and lead to rising borrowing costs and sluggish economic performance.
  • Global Debt Trends: Worldwide, public debt has surged, reaching a record USD 92 trillion in 2022, with developing countries, including India, facing challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, cost-of-living crisis, and climate change.
  • Debt Burden on Developing Nations: Developing countries, particularly in Africa, face higher borrowing costs than developed nations, impacting debt sustainability and leading to increased interest spending as a share of public revenues.

India's Credit Rating Challenges

  • IMF's Rating Context: While India is recognized as the fastest-growing major economy, credit rating agencies maintain a stable outlook of 'BBB-', the lowest investment grade, since 2006.
  • Rating Agencies' Perspective: Fitch Ratings and S&P Global Ratings cite weak fiscal performance, burdensome debt, and low per capita income as factors restraining India's credit rating improvement.
  • Debt-GDP Ratio and Fiscal Challenges: India's debt-to-GDP ratio remains high, slightly exceeding FRBMA targets. The emerging signs of fiscal slippage in FY24 pose challenges, with increased subsidies and potential budgetary pressures in an election year.
    You must be logged in to get greater insights.

    Editorials

    Context:

    SC expresses faith in SEBI’s investigation in Adani matter.                          

    Supreme Court's Verdict

    • Allegations Refuted: The Supreme Court rejects CBI or SIT probe, expressing confidence in SEBI's ongoing investigation into the Adani-Hindenburg controversy.
    • SEBI's Conduct Trustworthy: The Court lauds SEBI, stating its conduct "inspires confidence," and perceives no apparent regulatory failure in the current investigation.
    • Government's Directive: The Court directs the Centre to investigate if short sellers violated laws causing investor losses, shifting focus to market practices like short selling.

    Unanswered Questions and Ongoing SEBI Investigations

    • Pending Issues: Not all aspects, such as related party transactions and market manipulation, are fully addressed in SEBI's year-long investigation into Adani Group.
    • Doubts about Market Practices: Global market practices like short selling face scrutiny; the Court considers regulatory measures as potential solutions, raising concerns.
    • Ownership Complexity: Ongoing SEBI probes face challenges in determining the actual ownership of foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) due to entities in tax havens.

    Need for Prudent Allocation of Resources

    • Resource Allocation: The Supreme Court's decision lacks a large-scale probe, prompting the need for SEBI to receive additional resources and expertise.
    • Time-Bound Probe: Emphasizes the importance of a time-bound and conclusive SEBI investigation to dispel market concerns and restore confidence.
    • Call for Action: Urges SEBI to bring ongoing investigations to fruition, addressing market volatility concerns and ensuring a thorough examination of the Hindenburg allegations.
      You must be logged in to get greater insights.
      X

      Verifying, please be patient.

      Enquire Now