For a democratic country, the political system should be able to adapt the Constitution to challenging times. Also a sovereign nation must shape its future independently, free from external 'universal' values, as debates resurface around concepts like 'Basic Structure Doctrine'.
Doctrine's undefined basic features accumulate through case-by-case judgments, binding executive action, fostering "cheap talk" political culture, undermining action.
Nehru's First Amendment example underscores constitutional adaptability; Article 368 outlines parliamentary constituent power within stipulated procedures.
The Debate around Basic structure doctrine
The Rajya Sabha debate on Delhi Government's authority over services raises federal balance concerns, impacting 'Basic Structure Doctrine'.
Implications on fundamental rights, amendability, and judicial authority arise, notably for Article 370 hearings on Jammu and Kashmir.
Revisiting 1951's First Amendment debates, relevance of Article 21, Article 368, and reevaluation of the politicized Basic Structure Doctrine urged.
India’s Constitutional balance
India's political system balances an active judiciary and empowered legislature, maintaining democracy's resilience through separation of powers.
"Cancel culture" stifles debate, hindering justice and democratic progress; Nehru's vision emphasizes the importance of an autonomous Parliament.
The Basic Structure Doctrine, likened to a "Pole Star" by Chief Justice Chandrachud, guides navigation in turbulent times for effective governance.