Next Delimitation Commission must ensure fair representation for minorities, tackling both quantity and quality of vote dilution effectively.
Constitutional Safeguards
Quantitative and Qualitative dilution: Articles 81, 170, and 327 ensure fair delimitation, preventing both quantitative and qualitative dilution of vote value.
Maintain Electoral process: Independent commissions, led by retired judges, maintain the quality of the electoral process.
Data suggestions: National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution and the Sachar Committee Report: in a majority of the seats reserved for SCs by the Delimitation Commission (1972-76), the population of Muslims was more than 50% and also higher than the SC population.
Historical Delimitation Orders
Background: Four delimitation commissions shaped electoral boundaries in 1952, 1962, 1972, and 2002, impacting representation and population ratios.
Legislative amendments freeze population figures, affecting delimitation decisions.
Minority Status: At present, the share of Muslims MPs in Parliament is only around 4.42%, whereas the Muslim population is 14.2%.
Vote Value Disparities:
Dilution of vote value: The population of Rajasthan, Haryana, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, and Gujarat has increased by more than 125% between 1971 and 2011, whereas the population of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Goa, and Odisha has increased by less than 100% due to stricter population control measures.
Population growth disparities across states create significant vote value variations, leading to both quantitative and qualitative dilution.
Issues:Minorities face qualitative dilution through practices like cracking, stacking, and packing, impacting their parliamentary representation.