What's New :
2-Day Bootcamp on Essay Writing
13th September 2024 (9 Topics)

Separation of Power’

Context

"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" - Lord Acton

Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the Chief Justice’s residence has set off debate on the separation of powers (a cornerstone of the judiciary and a key feature of the basic structure of the Constitution) and post-retirement sinecures for judges. It has raised several questions, including the lack of up-keeping of the principle of separating the judiciary from the executive.

What is Separation of Powers?

  • Separation of powers is a fundamental principle of democratic governance that involves distributing the functions of government among different branches:
    • Legislative: Parliament ( Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha), State legislative bodies
    • Executive: President (central level), Governor (state level)
    • Judicial: Supreme Court, High Court and all other subordinate courts
  • This distribution aims to prevent the concentration of power in any single branch and to ensure that each branch operates independently yet cooperatively.
  • Application in the Indian Constitution: While the Indian Constitution does not explicitly use the term "separation of powers," it implicitly incorporates the concept by allocating distinct functions and powers to the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary.
    • In the case of Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab, SC held that the doctrine of separation of powers is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but each branch of government should not encroach on the functions of the others. Each organ must exercise its powers within the limits set by the Constitution.
  • This structure helps maintain a balanced system of governance and prevents any single branch from becoming too powerful.

Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Roles

Legislative Branch:

  • It is responsible for creating laws and overseeing their implementation. The Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) enacts laws within its jurisdiction as defined by the Union List, the Concurrent List, and the State List.
  • Oversight: The Legislature checks the Executive through mechanisms such as legislative oversight, budgetary control, and the power to impeach officials. The Parliament also has the authority to question and censure the Executive.

Legislative Authority

  • Article 245: Grants Parliament the authority to legislate on subjects specified in the Union List and Concurrent List, with respect to State List limitations.
  • Articles 53 and 154: Vest executive powers with the President at the Union level and the Governors at the State level. These powers are exercised based on the advice of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers at the central level, and the Chief Minister and Council of Ministers at the state level.
  • Article 123: Allows the President to promulgate ordinances when Parliament is not in session, addressing urgent legislative needs. These ordinances hold the force of law but must be approved by Parliament to remain effective.
  • Article 361: The President and the Governor enjoy immunity from court proceedings.
Executive Branch:
  • The branch enforces and administers laws. The Executive includes the President, the Prime Minister, and the Council of Ministers. It is tasked with implementing policies and laws enacted by the Legislature.
  • Checks on Legislature: The Executive can influence the Legislature through the President’s power to withhold assent to bills, thereby requiring further deliberation. Additionally, the Executive can issue ordinances in urgent situations, subject to parliamentary approval.
Judicial Branch:
  • Judiciary interprets laws and ensures their conformity with the Constitution. The Judiciary, headed by the Supreme Court, reviews laws and governmental actions through judicial review.
Judicial Independence
  • Article 50: The state shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the state.
    • Article 50 is a directive principle rather than a enforceable mandate.
  • Articles 121 and 211: The conduct of the judges cannot be taken about in the parliament and state legislature
  • Articles 32 and 136 confer the power of judicial review to the Supreme Court, allowing it to declare laws unconstitutional if they contravene Fundamental Rights (Article 13). The High Courts have similar powers under Articles 226 and 227.
Checks and Balances Mechanisms
  • Checks and balances are fundamental mechanisms within a democratic system that prevent any single branch of government from gaining too much power.
  • In India, these mechanisms are essential for maintaining a balanced governance structure where the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary operate independently yet interdependently.
  • The Indian Constitution’s Doctrine of Checks and Balance was introduced by the Supreme Court in the 1993 decision of Kannadasan v. Tamil Nadu State.

Legislative Checks

Executive Checks

Judicial Checks

  • No-Confidence Motions: The government must resign if it loses the confidence of the majority in Parliament.
  • Question Hour and Censure Motions: Ministers must answer questions posed by Parliament members, and Parliament can express disapproval of the Executive’s actions through censure motions.
  • Ordinances: The Executive can issue ordinances during Parliamentary recesses, though these must be approved by Parliament to remain effective.
  • The Executive operates within the framework set by the Legislature and is subject to judicial review of its actions.
  • Article 13: If a statute is arbitrary or unconstitutional, the judiciary has the authority to invalidate it.
    Additionally, it has the authority to deem unconstitutional presidential actions void.
  • Impeachment and Removal Procedures: Articles 61 and 124(4) of the Constitution detail the impeachment procedures for the President and Supreme Court judges, respectively.
X

Verifying, please be patient.

Enquire Now