Basic Structure doctrine is one of the strongest safeguards for Indian democracy.
Evolution of Basic Structure Doctrine
Shankari Prasad and Sajjan Singh (1951, 1964): Validated parliamentary amendments, upheld legislature's authority to amend without limitations.
Seeds of Basic Structure Doctrine in Sajjan Singh (1964): Judges questioned majority's approach, indicating concerns about fundamental rights as the "plaything of the majority."
Golaknath Case (1967): Challenged Parliament's power to amend Part 3, hinted at inherent limitations; birthed the Basic Structure theory.
Kesavananda Bharati (1971)
Legal Battle Origins: Challenged 24th-26th amendments; KB, head of a mutt, represented by Nani Palkhivala, brought implied limitations doctrine.
Implied Limitations Accepted: Six judges acknowledged implied limitations on Parliament's amending powers, rejecting alteration of Basic Structure.
Justice H R Khanna's Decisive Role: Dissenting from implied limitations, he held fundamental rights amendable but protected Basic Structure, endorsing Conrad's core doctrine.
Legacy of Basic Structure Doctrine
Enduring Principle: KB judgment entrenched Basic Structure, establishing that even a constitutional amendment could be unconstitutional if it violated the Basic Structure.
Impact on Jurisprudence: Applied in subsequent cases, it became a powerful safeguard against constitutional aberrations and tyranny.
Significance Beyond Borders: Other Commonwealth countries, like Bangladesh, adopted the Indian judicial invention, highlighting its global influence and admiration.