There is no substitute for an industrial policy

Context:

PLI is good for high-end manufacturing, but industrial policy is best bet for mass job creation.

Make in India vs. Historical Policies

Divergence from Past Policies: Make in India contrasts with 1970s self-sufficiency dogma, avoiding protectionist measures.
Concerns of Protectionism: Fears arise over tariff hikes in some sectors, reminiscent of 1970s protectionist tendencies.
Need for Caution: Protectionist history caused shortages and rent-seeking; calls for careful implementation of Make in India.

Examination of Make in India's Objectives

Core of Make in India: Launched in 2014 to boost manufacturing, transform India into a global export hub.
Derivatives of Make in India: Made in India and Make for India exist, but MII remains fundamental.
Critical Questions: Scrutiny needed on how MII is sold to the public and if it fulfills promised objectives.

Evaluating Industrial Policy and Job Creation

Industrial Policy Impact: New Industrial Policy 2023 put on hold; PLI aims to attract investments and ensure efficiency.
Need for Articulation: Industrial policy required for job creation, particularly in a labor-abundant country.
Importance of Data: Lack of frequent and detailed PLI data hinders scrutiny; need for policies promoting labor-intensive manufacturing.

You must be logged in to get greater insights.

Development led by corporates, not women

Society

Legitimising Revanchism

Polity & Governance

International Relations

Ecology and Environment

India’s fiscal deficit may breach 5.9% of GDP target

Economy