There is a need to revisit the subject of expenditure allocations by the Finance Commission.
Controversies in Expenditure Allocation:
Political Parties and Spending Priorities: In democracies, parties in power make decisions on public spending without referendums, to maximize economic value, favoring capital expenditure for its multiplier effect, but non-development expenditure also holds importance.
Redistribution and Progressive Taxation: Progressive tax structures are employed, but the concept of redistribution remains ambiguous, sometimes seen as providing "freebies" to the poor.
Public Preferences vs. Economic Value: Land acquisition for larger projects is contentious, as compensation issues arise, affecting landless laborers.
State vs. Centre
Citizen-Centric State Initiatives: States are more inclined to provide freebies, being closer to citizens and thus more attuned to their preferences.
Industrial expansion via Freebies: Free or subsidized meals, as well as power and water for farmers, are defended on the grounds of stabilizing prices and supporting vulnerable sections.
Debates on Loan Waivers and Industry Bailouts: Loan waivers are viewed favorably as they provide direct government support to vulnerable sections, unlike industry bailouts using depositors' money.
Addressing Spending Allocation Challenges
Election Promises and Fiscal Constraints: Political parties make promises to voters during elections, but there's often a gap between promises and actual delivery due to fiscal limitations.
The Need for Spending Norms: Implementing spending caps and ensuring parity across all levels of government could be a solution to the allocation dilemma.
Way forward: The upcoming Finance Commission should consider formulating such norms to guide expenditure decisions effectively.