What's New :
Target PT - Prelims Classes 2025. Visit Here
24th February 2025 (12 Topics)

Karnataka-Maharashtra Border Dispute

Context

Bus services between Karnataka and Maharashtra have come to a standstill after tensions flared up recently when a bus conductor was beaten up in Belagavi for allegedly not responding in Marathi.

What is the Karnataka-Maharashtra Border Dispute?

  • The border dispute between Karnataka and Maharashtra primarily centers around the region of Belagavi (formerly Belgaum), a district that has a significant Marathi-speaking population.
  • The dispute dates back to 1956 when India reorganized its states based on linguistic lines.
  • Belagavi was allocated to Karnataka, but Maharashtra claims that the district and several surrounding areas should belong to it, as they were part of the Bombay Presidency before independence.
  • Timeline:
    • 1956: The States Reorganisation Act was passed, forming new states based on linguistic majorities. Belagavi, despite its large Marathi-speaking population, was allocated to Karnataka.
    • 1960: Maharashtra started claiming Belagavi and several villages along the border, arguing that they were wrongly assigned to Karnataka. Maharashtra’s objections were primarily based on the linguistic makeup of these areas.
    • 1966: The Mahajan Commission was set up by the Indian government to resolve the issue. The commission ruled in favor of Karnataka, recommending that Belagavi and 247 villages remain with Karnataka, while 264 villages should be transferred to Maharashtra. Maharashtra rejected this recommendation.
    • 2004: Maharashtra took the matter to the Supreme Court, where it remains pending. The border dispute between the two states remains unresolved, with the Supreme Court yet to pass a final ruling.

Claims of Both States

  • Maharashtra’s Claims: Maharashtra claims 814 villages and the urban settlements of Belagavi, Karwar, and Nippani as historically belonging to the Bombay Presidency before India's independence.
    • Maharashtra argues that these regions, predominantly Marathi-speaking, should be part of Maharashtra.
    • In 2004, Maharashtra filed a petition in the Supreme Court, staking its claim over Belagavi.
  • Karnataka’s Claims: Karnataka defends its position, claiming that Belagavi and surrounding areas were rightly included based on the States Reorganisation Act of 1956.
    • The 1966 Mahajan Commission Report supports Karnataka’s claim, as it recommended that Belagavi and 247 villages should stay with Karnataka.
    • Karnataka has also cited the linguistic lines drawn by the Act and the economic development in Belagavi since it became part of Karnataka.
    • Karnataka has built a Suvarna Vidhana Soudha in Belagavi to assert its control and hold the winter sessions of the Karnataka legislature there since 2006.
Fact Box:

Mahajan Commission

  • The Mahajan Commission was set up in 1966 under the leadership of Mehr Chand Mahajan, the then Chief Justice of India.
    • The Commission's task was to review the border dispute and recommend solutions.
    • It recommended that 264 villages be transferred to Maharashtra, but Belagavi and 247 villages remain part of Karnataka.
    • Maharashtra rejected the Commission's findings, while Karnataka accepted them.
    • Karnataka has since argued that the Commission's decision should be implemented in full, or the status quo should be maintained.

Key Inter-State Border Disputes in India:

  • Assam-Mizoram: Dispute over boundaries stemming from two British-era notifications. Mizoram claims the 1875 boundary, Assam the 1933 boundary.
  • Haryana-Himachal Pradesh: Focused on the Parwanoo region, with Haryana claiming parts of Himachal's territory.
  • Himachal Pradesh-Ladakh: Disagreement over Sarchu, a strategically important area on the Leh-Manali route.
  • Arunachal Pradesh-Assam: Arunachal disputes the transfer of forested areas to Assam during the North Eastern States reorganisation; the matter is pending in the Supreme Court.
  • Meghalaya-Assam: Meghalaya contests the Assam Reorganisation Act (1971), claiming Blocks I and II of Mikir Hills.
  • Assam-Nagaland: The longest-running border dispute, concerning Naga-dominated areas post-Nagaland's formation in 1963.
X

Verifying, please be patient.

Enquire Now