The House needs to have a robust procedure to determine lawmakers’ misconduct, violations of ethical norms.
LokSabha's Expulsion of MahuaMoitra
Reason of Explusion: LokSabha expels MahuaMoitra based on alleged misconduct without allowing her a defense speech.
Claims against the act: Moitra claims a lack of proof, calls it a witch hunt; opposition MPs walk out during the decision.
Critique: The controversial process emphasizes the need for fair and transparent procedures in Parliament.
International Models for Ethical Oversight
Advocating Fairness: US and UK employ independent offices for ethical oversight, investigating complaints and scrutinizing MPs' conduct.
Official Intervention: High standards for removing a member in the US; UK maintains a public Register of Interests and an independent commissioner.
Unilateral Expulsion: India's RajyaSabha has a defined code of conduct, while LokSabha lacks similar provisions for ethical oversight.
Robust Ethical Oversight
Ethical Challenges: India's Provisional Parliament faced ethical challenges in 1951, urging the need for a code of conduct.
Human interface and impacts: The importance of a robust procedure for determining MPs' misconduct, protecting legislative integrity.
The Role of Fair Processes: A fair process ensures parliamentary dignity, upholding ethical norms, and addressing public apprehensions about legislative decisions.