What's New :
GS Mains Classes, Batch Start: 4th June, Click Here
21st May 2025 (13 Topics)

Supreme Court restores rule mandating 3-year law practice for judicial service

Context

The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, has restored the mandatory requirement of 3 years of law practice for candidates applying to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) posts across India.

Background of the Issue:

  • Pre-2002: The Supreme Court had mandated 3 years of law practice for entry into judicial services.
  • 2002 Order: This condition was removed to attract bright young law graduates and make judicial service more appealing.
  • This decision was based on the recommendations of the Shetty Commission (1996), which aimed to improve service conditions for the judiciary.

Key Developments in 2024 Judgment:

  • Petitioner: All India Judges Association approached SC to restore the earlier practice.
  • Bench: Headed by CJI Bhushan R Gavai, with Justices A G Masih and K Vinod Chandran.
  • SC Observation: Recruitment of fresh law graduates “has not been successful” — they lack:
    • Practical knowledge of courts,
    • Understanding of litigation,
    • Sensitivity to human problems.
  • Order Highlights:
    • Only a practicing lawyer can understand the “intricacies of litigation” and justice delivery.
    • States & High Courts directed to amend recruitment rules within 3 months.
    • Recruitment already notified will not be affected. The new rule applies to future recruitments only.

Experience Certification Mechanism:

  • Candidates must produce:
    • Certificate from a lawyer with at least 10 years of Bar practice.
    • The certificate must be endorsed by a Principal Judicial Officer.
  • High Court/Supreme Court practitioners need a certificate endorsed by a judge-attested senior lawyer.
  • Experience counted from provisional registration, formal only after All India Bar Examination clearance.
X

Verifying, please be patient.

Enquire Now