Supreme Court restores rule mandating 3-year law practice for judicial service
Context
The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, has restored the mandatory requirement of 3 years of law practice for candidates applying to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) posts across India.
Background of the Issue:
Pre-2002: The Supreme Court had mandated 3 years of law practice for entry into judicial services.
2002 Order: This condition was removed to attract bright young law graduates and make judicial service more appealing.
This decision was based on the recommendations of the Shetty Commission (1996), which aimed to improve service conditions for the judiciary.
Key Developments in 2024 Judgment:
Petitioner:All India Judges Association approached SC to restore the earlier practice.
Bench: Headed by CJI Bhushan R Gavai, with Justices A G Masih and K Vinod Chandran.
SC Observation: Recruitment of fresh law graduates “has not been successful” — they lack:
Practical knowledge of courts,
Understanding of litigation,
Sensitivity to human problems.
Order Highlights:
Only a practicing lawyer can understand the “intricacies of litigation” and justice delivery.
States & High Courts directed to amend recruitment rules within 3 months.
Recruitment already notified will not be affected. The new rule applies to future recruitments only.
Experience Certification Mechanism:
Candidates must produce:
Certificate from a lawyer with at least 10 years of Bar practice.
The certificate must be endorsed by a Principal Judicial Officer.
High Court/Supreme Court practitioners need a certificate endorsed by a judge-attested senior lawyer.
Experience counted from provisional registration, formal only after All India Bar Examination clearance.