16th April 2025 (8 Topics)
1
Apr
2
Apr
3
Apr
4
Apr
5
Apr
7
Apr
8
Apr
9
Apr
10
Apr
11
Apr
12
Apr
14
Apr
15
Apr
16
Apr
17
Apr
18
Apr
19
Apr
On de-extinction and conservation
You must be logged in to get greater insights. click here to login
Context
Colossal Biosciences, a US-based company led by Harvard geneticist George Church, is attempting de-extinction by combining genomics with conservation, aiming to revive extinct species like the woolly mammoth to combat climate change impacts in the Arctic tundra.
De-Extinction Technology and Process
- Genome Reconstruction: DNA fragments from mammoth fossils are sequenced and compared with the Asian elephant genome to identify and edit mammoth-specific traits.
- Genetic Editing Tools: CRISPR and related gene-editing technologies are used to engineer traits such as thick fur, subcutaneous fat, and cold resistance in elephants.
- Experimental Successes and Claims: Three snow-white wolves, claimed to resemble the extinct dire wolf, have been born, although their classification remains disputed due to minimal (20 gene) edits.
Climate Rationale and Ecological Argument
- Climate Restoration Model: Mammoths once maintained grasslands which reflected more solar radiation; their return is hypothesized to slow permafrost melting and reduce methane release.
- Siberian Park Experiment: Cold-resistant animals are introduced into Arctic ecosystems to replicate Pleistocene-era grazing effects and restore grassland ecology.
- Tundra vs Shrubland Impact: Grasslands absorb less heat than shrubs and help maintain lower surface temperatures, although this effect is mitigative, not preventive.
Ethical, Financial, and Conservation Concerns
- Misplaced Conservation Priorities: Current extinction threats stem from habitat loss and human activity; de-extinction diverts funds from pressing conservation efforts.
- Peer Review and Scientific Rigor: Projects lack peer validation and may exaggerate outcomes; for instance, the dire wolf project is viewed skeptically for its superficial resemblances.
- Need for Regulatory Oversight: The absence of comprehensive international guidelines for non-health-related gene-editing raises ethical and ecological risks.
Practice Question:
“Reviving extinct species using gene-editing tools may offer futuristic solutions but also poses immediate ecological and ethical challenges.” Critically examine this statement in light of recent developments in synthetic biology and conservation policy.
More Articles
Courses
Study
Notes
Home
Resources
More
