11th June 2024 (13 Topics)
1
Jun
3
Jun
4
Jun
5
Jun
6
Jun
7
Jun
8
Jun
10
Jun
11
Jun
12
Jun
13
Jun
14
Jun
15
Jun
17
Jun
18
Jun
19
Jun
20
Jun
21
Jun
22
Jun
24
Jun
25
Jun
26
Jun
27
Jun
28
Jun
29
Jun
Why India needs a third aircraft carrier
You must be logged in to get greater insights. click here to login
Context
Recent media reports indicate progress towards the construction of a third aircraft carrier for the Indian Navy by Cochin Shipyard Limited (CSL), aiming to prevent the lapse of carrier-building expertise and addressing long-standing operational requirements.
Key Aspects of the Third Aircraft Carrier:
- Naval Imperatives and Historical Precedents: The decision to proceed with the construction of the Indigenous Aircraft Carrier-2 (IAC-2) reflects the Indian Navy's strategic imperative to maintain a robust fleet, recalling past lapses in submarine-building expertise. The initiative seeks to avoid a repeat of past mistakes, such as the dissipation of Mazagaon Dock Shipbuilder's capabilities, and instead ensure continuity in carrier-building capabilities.
- Operational Significance and Challenges: The IAC-2, an add-on to the Vikrant-class carriers, aims to fulfill the Navy's requirement for carrier presence on both seaboards and a reserve carrier. However, concerns linger regarding the project's substantial cost, estimated at $5-6 billion, and its operational effectiveness in the face of evolving anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, particularly from China and Pakistan.
- Strategic Considerations and Alternative Approaches: Debates within the Indian Navy revolve around the strategic choice between pursuing a 'sea denial' strategy, primarily utilizing submarines, or investing in 'sea control' through carrier battle groups. Some voices question the prioritization of a new carrier over other critical naval assets, such as submarines and surface combatants.
Exploring Alternative Strategies and Upgrading Capabilities:
- Diversifying Military Capabilities: Alternative strategies include enhancing military capabilities in the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago to establish an A2/AD maritime 'exclusive zone,' deterring potential threats, including the Chinese navy. This approach offers a potentially cost-effective and resilient alternative to investing in additional aircraft carriers.
- Leveraging Existing Assets and Technological Advancements: Some advocate for maximizing the operational capabilities of existing assets, such as SEPECAT Jaguar IM/IS and Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighters, equipped with maritime strike capabilities and advanced radar systems. Additionally, the deployment of Su-30MKI squadrons armed with supersonic cruise missiles enhances the Indian Air Force's maritime surveillance and strike capabilities.
- Cost-Benefit Analysis and Strategic Prioritization: Military planners weigh the costs and benefits of aircraft carriers against alternative defense strategies and asset upgrades. The limited defense budget, coupled with competing demands from other branches of the military, underscores the need for strategic prioritization and resource optimization in addressing India's security challenges.
Mains Question:
Q. Evaluate the strategic significance of India's decision to proceed with the construction of a third aircraft carrier, considering operational imperatives, financial constraints, and evolving security threats in the region.
More Articles
Courses
Study
Notes
Home
Resources
More
