India's security agencies had prepared a dossier nailing the culpability of Pakistan in the Pulwama terror strike.
This was presented to the terror financing watchdog, Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to push for Pakistan's inclusion in the FATF's black list.
Context:
India's security agencies had prepared a dossier nailing the culpability of Pakistan in the Pulwama terror strike.
This was presented to the terror financing watchdog, Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to push for Pakistan's inclusion in the FATF's black list.
About:
A delegation of the Asia-Pacific Joint Group (APJG), which is a regional association of the FATF, is scheduled to reach Islamabad, and following a review over the next two days, submit its report to the FATF.
Pakistan has objected to India as being a Co-Chair of APJG and has asked FATF to appoint any other member country as co-chair “to ensure that the review process is fair, unbiased and objective.
Background:
Financial Action Task Force (FATF):
Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND)
|
The FATF’s 38 members (36 member jurisdictions and two regional organizations, the European Commission and Gulf Cooperation Council), two observer jurisdictions (Indonesia and Saudi Arabia), and multiple observer organizations (mainly international banks and law enforcement bodies) attend the Plenary.
India is an FATF member; Pakistan is not.
In 2018, FATF approved the nomination for monitoring of Pakistan under its International Cooperation Review Group, commonly known as the ‘grey list’.
The move backed by the US and the UK was passed by the body that works to combat money laundering and terrorist financing after China and the Gulf Cooperation Council withdrew their opposition.
The action plan was forwarded to the International Cooperation Review Group (ICRG) of the Asia Pacific Group (APG).
The ICRG identified four key areas of concerns:
In June 2018, Pakistan submitted a 26-point action plan to the FATF, committing to implement it over the next 15 months.
The action plan included a squeeze on the finances of Jamaat-udDawa, Falah-i-Insaniyat, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, Haqqani Network and the Afghan Taliban.
The failure to negotiate the action plan could have led to Pakistan being blacklisted.
In January 2019, the FATF decided to keep Pakistan on the grey list, based on a review that concluded that the country had made “limited progress” in curbing money laundering and terrorism.
Pakistan was on the FATF watch list between 2012 and 2015 as well, but only for money laundering.
Whether Pakistan remains in the grey list or is placed in the black list will be clear by October 2019.
India's stand at the FATF:
India has been an active member in the FATF and in its various sub-groups after 2013 following New Delhi’s effort to introduce changes to the AML/CFT (combat money laundering and terrorist financing) systems and laws.
India has been lobbying hard for the strict monitoring of Pakistan, and highlighting the funding of terrorist activities by that country.
India has in the past provided evidence of the involvement of Pakistani officials in peddling fake currency, and planning attacks on Indian assets on foreign soil.
What happens if Pakistan gets blacklisted
This could become a difficult circumstance for Pakistan given that Pakistan is likely to secure an IMF bailout soon to stave off a balance of payment crisis and help shore up its economy - the country's foreign currency reserves have reportedly dwindled to around $8 billion, just enough to cover about two months of imports. Landing on the FATF black list might jeopardize such plans.
Practice Question:
Pakistan has revised its terrorism financing risk assessment; however, it does not demonstrate a proper understanding of the terrorism financing risks posed by Da'esh, Al Qaeda and the related terrorist organizations that operate from its soil. How far would the FATF framework help in taming Pakistan? Critically evaluate.
Verifying, please be patient.