Gene editing technologies have enormous potential benefits, but like other developing technologies, have limitations and risks.
What is the difference between Somatic Gene Editing and Germline Gene Editing?
Somatic Gene Editing |
Germline Gene Editing |
|
Edit |
Somatic therapies target genes in specific types of cells. For example- Blood Cells |
Germline modifications are made so early in development that any change is copied into all of the new cells. |
Copy |
The edited gene is contained only in the target cell type. No other types of cells are affected. |
The edited gene is copied in every cell, including sperm or eggs. |
Next-generation |
Any changes are limited to the targeted individual. It is not passed down to future generations. |
The edited gene is passed on to future generations. |
Concerns in India:
The above issues paint an alarming picture of the state of regulation with regard to medical services in India and raise several concerns when considering the regulation of profitable gene-editing technology.
What is DNA?
Genome editing is of great interest in the prevention and treatment of human diseases. Currently, most research on genome editing is done to understand diseases using cells and animal models. Scientists are still working to determine whether this approach is safe and effective for use in people. Its significance can be known from the following points:
Regulation of genome editing techniques in India:
The development of CRISPR-Cas proteins for genome editing applications has had a profound impact on biology and biotechnology over the past few years. These tools have democratized the ability to rewrite the information contained in genomes and thereby to both understand and alter genetic traits. The positives and negatives of gene-editing technologies are discussed and disseminated to a great degree. They represent very real, tangible opportunities at positively impacting the lives of various patients with certain diseases. However, it is essential not to generalise this potential across societies and nations, but to recognise that each country is unique and has its own narrative. Going forward, understanding that the technology of gene editing, requires more caution than optimism, regulatory efforts must pause to consider these issues in depth.
In the case of India, it is crucial that new rules and regulations are created to take into account the country’s unique professional and sociocultural landscape and, in addition, it's capacity for ensuring that such a technology is handled responsibly and ethically.
Q1. What is genome editing? Discuss the current state of the science of human gene editing, as well as possible future directions and challenges.
Q2. What are the potential clinical applications that may hold promise for the treatment of human diseases?
Q3. Do current ethical and legal standards for human subject’s research adequately address human gene editing, including germ line editing? What are the ethical, legal, and social implications of the use of current and projected gene-editing technologies in humans?
Verifying, please be patient.